🎯 TL;DR - Key Findings

  • Overall Winner: Wiz - Best balance of coverage (98%), accuracy (90% true positive), and usability
  • Best for AWS: Orca Security - Deepest AWS-native integration, 80-90% true positive rate
  • Best for Compliance: Prisma Cloud - 100+ frameworks, most comprehensive policy library
  • Fastest Deployment: Orca - Full visibility in 24 hours vs 2-3 days for others
  • False Positives: Orca wins - 10-20% FP rate vs Wiz 10% vs Prisma 20-30%
  • Cost: Orca is cheapest - ~30% less than Wiz, ~40% less than Prisma for our 9K assets

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

πŸ† Interactive Scorecard

Overall scores based on our 6-month evaluation across 8 criteria. Click vendor cards below to see detailed breakdowns.

Wiz

Overall Winner
88

out of 100

Coverage 98/100
Accuracy 90/100
Performance 95/100
Usability 92/100
Integration 85/100
Cost 70/100
Support 88/100
Remediation 82/100

Orca Security

Best Value
86

out of 100

Coverage 95/100
Accuracy 92/100
Performance 98/100
Usability 90/100
Integration 80/100
Cost 90/100
Support 82/100
Remediation 75/100

Prisma Cloud

Most Features
81

out of 100

Coverage 100/100
Accuracy 75/100
Performance 85/100
Usability 72/100
Integration 95/100
Cost 60/100
Support 90/100
Remediation 88/100

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

πŸ”¬ Testing Methodology

To ensure fairness and real-world applicability, we ran all three platforms simultaneously for 6 months across our production multi-cloud environment.

Test Environment

AWS: 5,000 assets Azure: 3,000 assets GCP: 1,000 assets 9,000 total assets
Asset Type AWS Count Azure Count GCP Count
VMs / Instances 2,500 1,200 400
Containers 1,200 800 300
Serverless Functions 600 400 150
Storage Buckets 400 300 100
Databases 200 200 40
Other (Networks, IAM, etc.) 100 100 10

Evaluation Criteria

  1. Coverage (0-100): % of CIS benchmarks detected, resource types scanned, cloud services supported
  2. Accuracy (0-100): True positive rate, false positive rate, severity accuracy
  3. Performance (0-100): Time to first scan, scan frequency, dashboard responsiveness
  4. Usability (0-100): UI/UX quality, learning curve, search/filter capabilities
  5. Integration (0-100): SIEM, ticketing, CI/CD, IaC scanning quality
  6. Cost (0-100): Price per asset, total 3-year TCO, discount flexibility
  7. Support (0-100): Response time, knowledge quality, TAM access
  8. Remediation (0-100): Auto-remediation options, guided fixes, IaC templates
πŸ’‘ Testing Protocol: All three platforms deployed in read-only mode for first 30 days to establish baselines. Month 2-6: Active use with weekly review meetings to document findings, alert volumes, and false positive analysis.

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

πŸ“Š Coverage Analysis

How comprehensively does each platform scan your cloud environment? We measured against CIS benchmarks, supported services, and workload types.

πŸ† Winner: Prisma Cloud (100/100)

+

Why Prisma Cloud Wins Coverage

Prisma Cloud has the most comprehensive policy library with 700+ predefined policies covering 120+ cloud services. Palo Alto's long presence in the market shows in the depth and breadth of coverage.

CIS Benchmark Coverage

AWS CIS Benchmark v1.5.0
100% (245/245)
Azure CIS Benchmark v2.0.0
100% (283/283)
GCP CIS Benchmark v1.3.0
100% (192/192)

Unique Coverage Areas

  • βœ… OCI (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure) - only Prisma supports
  • βœ… Alibaba Cloud - only Prisma supports
  • βœ… 100+ compliance frameworks (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, NIST, etc.)
  • βœ… Code Security (IaC scanning for Terraform, CloudFormation, ARM)
  • βœ… Network Security (micro-segmentation, flow log analysis)
βœ… Verdict: If you need exhaustive coverage across uncommon cloud services or have multi-cloud beyond AWS/Azure/GCP, Prisma Cloud is unmatched. However, this breadth comes at a cost (complexity and higher false positives).

πŸ₯ˆ Runner-Up: Wiz (98/100)

+

Why Wiz Scores 98/100

Wiz covers all major cloud services with excellent depth, losing only 2 points for not supporting Oracle Cloud or Alibaba Cloud (which we don't use anyway).

CIS Benchmark Coverage

AWS CIS Benchmark v1.5.0
98% (240/245)
Azure CIS Benchmark v2.0.0
97% (275/283)
GCP CIS Benchmark v1.3.0
100% (192/192)

Wiz's Unique Strengths

  • βœ… Full-stack visibility: CSPM + CWPP + CIEM + DSPM in single pane
  • βœ… Attack path analysis: Shows relationships between misconfigurations
  • βœ… Runtime context: Understands which misconfigs are actually exploitable
  • βœ… API-first architecture: Every scan result is queryable via GraphQL
πŸ’‘ Real-World Example: Wiz identified a public S3 bucket containing credentials that had network access to a database with PII. Prisma and Orca flagged the bucket, but only Wiz showed the full attack path and prioritized it as Critical.

πŸ₯‰ Third Place: Orca Security (95/100)

+

Why Orca Scores 95/100

Orca has excellent coverage for AWS/Azure/GCP but lacks some of the advanced features and edge-case service support of Wiz and Prisma.

CIS Benchmark Coverage

AWS CIS Benchmark v1.5.0
96% (235/245)
Azure CIS Benchmark v2.0.0
93% (263/283)
GCP CIS Benchmark v1.3.0
97% (186/192)

Orca's SideScanning Advantage

While Orca has slightly lower CIS coverage, its patented SideScanningβ„’ technology provides visibility that API-only tools miss:

  • βœ… In-OS vulnerability scanning (without agents)
  • βœ… Installed software inventory
  • βœ… Malware detection in workload filesystems
  • βœ… Secrets scanning in code, config files, environment vars
βœ… Unique Finding: Orca detected a hardcoded API key in a Lambda function's /tmp directory that neither Wiz nor Prisma caught (both rely on API calls only). This demonstrates the value of block-storage-level scanning.

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

🎯 False Positive Analysis

The #1 complaint about CSPMs is alert fatigue. We measured false positive rates across 10,000+ alerts over 6 months.

πŸ“Š Measurement Method: Random sample of 500 alerts per month per vendor (9,000 alerts total). Security team manually validated each alert as True Positive, False Positive, or Indeterminate. False Positive Rate = FP / (TP + FP).
Vendor True Positive Rate False Positive Rate Winner
Orca Security 80-90% 10-20% πŸ† Best
Wiz 90% ~10% Excellent
Prisma Cloud 70-75% 20-30% Needs Tuning

πŸ” Deep Dive: Why Prisma Has More False Positives

+

Root Causes of Prisma's Higher FP Rate

1. Over-Broad Policy Definitions

Example: Prisma flagged 200+ EC2 instances as "publicly accessible" because their VPC had an Internet Gateway. However, instances were in private subnets with no public IPs. Wiz and Orca correctly filtered these out.

2. Lack of Contextual Awareness

Prisma alerted on "S3 bucket allows public access" for a bucket hosting our public website (intentionally public). Wiz's context engine understood the bucket contained only static HTML/CSS/JS and downgraded severity. Orca had similar intelligence.

3. Severity Misclassification

Prisma marked "CloudTrail not enabled in all regions" as Critical for a test AWS account with $0 spend and no resources. Context matters - Wiz and Orca correctly lowered severity for low-risk environments.

Tuning Prisma Cloud

After 3 months of aggressive policy tuning (disabling noisy policies, adjusting severity thresholds, adding exclusions), we reduced Prisma's false positive rate from 35% to 22%. This required 40+ hours of dedicated tuning time.

⚠️ The Tuning Tax: Plan for 2-3 months of active tuning when deploying Prisma Cloud. It's extremely powerful but requires significant customization to reduce noise. Wiz and Orca work better "out of the box."

βœ… Why Orca and Wiz Have Lower FP Rates

+

Orca's SideScanning Precision

By scanning at the block-storage level, Orca sees the actual filesystem state, not just API metadata. This dramatically improves accuracy:

  • βœ… Can see if a vulnerable package is actually installed (not just "present")
  • βœ… Detects if a misconfigured service is actually running vs stopped
  • βœ… Understands network connectivity at the OS level

Wiz's Runtime Context

Wiz's attack path analysis adds context that reduces false positives:

  • βœ… "Public S3 bucket" downgraded if no sensitive data present
  • βœ… "Overly permissive IAM role" downgraded if role is unused (no API calls in 90 days)
  • βœ…> "Unpatched vulnerability" prioritized only if workload is internet-facing
βœ… Real Impact: Both Orca and Wiz kept our daily alert volume under 20-30 actionable findings. Prisma generated 100-150 daily alerts, with 70-80 being false positives or low-value. This translated to 2 hours/day saved in alert triage.

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

πŸ’° Cost Comparison

CSPM pricing varies dramatically. We got quotes for our 9,000-asset environment and extrapolated 3-year TCO.

Vendor Year 1 Cost 3-Year TCO Per-Asset (Annual) Winner
Orca Security $270K $710K $30 πŸ† Best Value
Wiz $385K $1.01M $43 Fair
Prisma Cloud $450K $1.18M $50 Expensive
πŸ’‘ Pricing Notes: All vendors offered multi-year discounts (12-18% off). Orca was most flexible on pricing. Wiz wouldn't budge below $385K. Prisma initially quoted $520K but came down to $450K after competitive negotiation.

Hidden Costs to Consider

  • Professional Services: Prisma recommended $50K PS engagement for initial tuning. Wiz and Orca included onboarding in base price.
  • Training: Prisma complexity required 2-day training ($5K). Wiz and Orca were intuitive enough to skip formal training.
  • Operational Overhead: Prisma's higher false positive rate = 2 hours/day Γ— $150/hr Γ— 260 days = $78K/year in analyst time.
  • Integration Development: Prisma's webhook integration required custom dev work ($20K). Wiz and Orca had native Splunk integrations.
βœ… True 3-Year TCO (Including Hidden Costs):
  • Orca: $710K (lowest)
  • Wiz: $1.01M (+42%)
  • Prisma: $1.41M (+99%) when factoring operational overhead

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

πŸ”Œ Integration Quality

How well do these platforms fit into your existing security stack? We tested SIEM, ticketing, CI/CD, and IaC scanning integrations.

Integration Type Wiz Orca Security Prisma Cloud
SIEM (Splunk) β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Native app
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Native app
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Native app
Ticketing (Jira) β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Bi-directional sync
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
One-way only
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Bi-directional sync
ServiceNow β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Certified app
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Certified app
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Certified app
CI/CD (GitHub Actions) β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Native action
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
API only
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Native action
IaC Scanning (Terraform) β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Good
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Basic
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Excellent
Slack / Teams Alerts β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Rich formatting
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Basic alerts
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Basic alerts
πŸ† Integration Winner: Prisma Cloud (95/100)
Palo Alto's mature ecosystem shows here. Prisma has the widest array of native integrations, especially for IaC scanning and CI/CD. Wiz is close behind (85/100), while Orca (80/100) lags slightly in breadth but nails the core integrations (SIEM, ServiceNow).

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

πŸ–₯️ User Experience & Usability

A CSPM is only valuable if your team actually uses it. We evaluated UI/UX quality, learning curve, and day-to-day operational efficiency.

πŸ† Winner: Wiz (92/100)

+

Why Wiz Wins Usability

  • Modern UI: Clean, intuitive interface. New team members productive in 1 day.
  • Powerful search: Natural language queries ("show me public databases with PII") actually work
  • Graph visualization: Attack paths rendered beautifully, easy to understand blast radius
  • Dashboard customization: Build custom views in 5 minutes, share with team
  • Mobile app: iOS/Android apps for on-call alerts (only Wiz has this)
βœ… Team Feedback: 9/10 security engineers preferred Wiz's interface over Prisma and Orca. Quote: "I actually enjoy using Wiz - can't say that about most security tools."

πŸ₯ˆ Runner-Up: Orca Security (90/100)

+

Orca's Usability Strengths

  • Simple & focused: No overwhelming feature bloat, everything has a clear purpose
  • Fast search: Results appear in <1 second, even with 9K assets
  • Asset timeline: See full history of an asset's security posture over time
  • Excellent reporting: Pre-built executive reports that actually look good

Minor Weaknesses

  • ⚠️ Limited dashboard customization (pre-built dashboards only)
  • ⚠️ No mobile app
  • ⚠️ Graph visualization less polished than Wiz

πŸ₯‰ Third Place: Prisma Cloud (72/100)

+

Why Prisma Scores Lower

  • ⚠️ Complex UI: Steep learning curve, new users overwhelmed by options
  • ⚠️ Slow performance: Dashboards take 5-10 seconds to load
  • ⚠️ Inconsistent UX: Different modules (CSPM, CWPP, Code Security) feel disjointed
  • ⚠️ Limited search: Must use RQL (custom query language) for advanced queries
⚠️ The Learning Curve: Prisma requires formal training. We sent 3 engineers to 2-day Prisma Cloud Fundamentals course ($5K). They still struggled for 2-3 weeks to become proficient. Contrast with Wiz/Orca: productive after 1-hour self-guided walkthrough.

Prisma's Strengths

Despite usability challenges, Prisma excels in some areas:

  • βœ… Advanced users love RQL (Palo Alto's query language) for complex investigations
  • βœ… Audit logs and change tracking are industry-best
  • βœ… RBAC and multi-tenancy more granular than competitors

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

πŸ† Final Verdict & Decision Matrix

After 6 months of intensive testing, here's our final recommendation based on different use cases:

Use Case Best Choice Why
Overall Winner Wiz Best balance of coverage, accuracy, usability, and modern architecture
Best Value Orca Security 30-40% cheaper with excellent accuracy and deployment speed
AWS-Heavy (>70% assets) Orca Security Deepest AWS-native integration, SideScanning catches what APIs miss
Compliance-Driven Prisma Cloud 100+ frameworks, most comprehensive policy library, audit-friendly
Fast Deployment (<1 week) Orca Security Full visibility in 24 hours, minimal configuration required
Enterprise (Fortune 500) Wiz Scalability, advanced features, attack path analysis
Dev/Sec/Ops Integration Prisma Cloud Superior IaC scanning, CI/CD integrations, shift-left capabilities
Limited Budget Orca Security Best features-per-dollar, no hidden costs
Multi-Cloud (AWS/Azure/GCP balanced) Wiz Consistent experience across all 3 major clouds
Small Team (<5 sec engineers) Orca Security Low false positives = less alert fatigue, easy to use

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

πŸ“‹ Our Ultimate Recommendation

After careful consideration, we selected Wiz for our production environment. Here's why:

βœ… Why We Chose Wiz

  • Best overall scores: 88/100 across all criteria
  • Team productivity: Security engineers preferred using Wiz (9/10 votes)
  • Attack path analysis: Unique capability that dramatically improved prioritization
  • Low false positives: 90% true positive rate kept alert volume manageable
  • Future-proof: Rapid innovation, monthly feature releases, modern architecture
  • Vendor momentum: Wiz is clearly the industry leader with massive growth

The Orca Alternative

If budget was our primary constraint, we would have chosen Orca Security. At 30% lower cost with similar accuracy and faster deployment, Orca is the clear value winner. For startups or mid-sized companies, Orca is a fantastic choice.

When to Choose Prisma

If you're already in the Palo Alto ecosystem (PA firewalls, Cortex XDR), Prisma Cloud makes sense for unified management. It's also unmatched if you need exhaustive compliance reporting for auditors or have regulatory requirements demanding maximum coverage.

πŸ’‘ Implementation Note: We're running Wiz in production and kept Orca as a secondary validation tool (read-only) for 6 more months. This "dual-platform" approach costs an extra $270K but gives us redundancy and a second opinion on critical findings. Worth it for a $2B company.

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025

πŸ’¬ Questions or Different Experience?

This guide is community-maintained. If you've done your own CSPM evaluation, have different results, or want to discuss your cloud security strategy:

πŸ’¬ Start Discussion πŸ› Report Issue

πŸ“Š CSPM Capabilities Comparison

Source: Multi-cloud production deployments (AWS, Azure, GCP) + G2 Reviews 2025